Coming to Know
Children as Readers & Writers
Dr. Frank Serafini
University of
Nevada, Las Vegas
serafini@unlv.nevada.edu
Assessment OF Learning
Large Scale Assessments
One Time - Snapshot of Learning
Used for Comparisons
Not Effective for Individual Assessment
Offers Little for Classroom Teachers
Consequential Validity
High Stakes Testing Challenges
Assessment FOR Learning
Utilizes a Variety of Sources of Information
Involves Students & Parents
Focuses on Abilities, Not Deficits
Is On-Going - Longitudinal
Guides Teaching and Learning
Respects the Teacher as Knowledgeable Observer
Is Non-Competitive
Teacher as Knowledgeable Observer
Our assessment practices are based on our definitions of
proficient reading and writing. As we define what reading and writing IS, we
decide what we will look FOR and how we will evaluate these practices.
Purposes of Classroom Based Assessment
Help Students Develop as Readers & Writers
Help Students Understand Themselves as Readers and Writers
Help Teachers Develop Curriculum & Instruction
Help Teachers Articulate Their Knowledge of Students to
External Stakeholders (Parents, District etc.)
Help students make their literate abilities visible
What Should We Assess?
The Learning Environment
Literacy Practices
Literacy Products
Attitudes
Levels of Engagement
Comprehension
Assessing the Learning Environment
Physical Environment
Social Dynamics
Historical Expectations
Interactional Patterns
Instructional Approaches
Classroom Power Structures
3 Principles of the Physical Environment
Authenticity / Definition / Access
Historical Expectations
What do students know about your classroom before they get
there?
What do you do every year?
What do parents know about your teaching?
How would the principal characterize your teaching?
Classroom Power Structures
What is on the walls of the classroom?
Where is the teacher's desk?
What are the procedures for leaving the room?
Is there a system for students to make suggestions?
Are there established classroom jobs?
Who set up the room?
Who asks the most questions?
Assessing Writers & Writing: Focus on Practices &
Products
What Do We Assess About Writers?
Sense of self as a writer
Willingness to engage in writing
Knowledge of resources
Ability to read like a writer
Knowledge of workshop procedures
Sense of purpose and audience
Knowledge of writing conventions
Ability to demonstrate one’s development as a writer
Gathering Information
Teacher as Observer
Focus on Writing Practices & Products
Allows learners and teachers to see growth over time
Used to make judgments, but not judgmental
Focus on Writing Practices
Image as Writer
Willingness to Engage in Writing
Knowledge of Resources
Reading / Writing Connections
Procedural Knowledge
Sense of Audience & Purpose
Observational Records
Date and label each Record
Context of the event
No secrets
Simple system, what works for you
Accounts for every child
Describe rather than evaluate
Note student progress
Teacher - Student Conferences
Attitudinal information
Discuss how writing is going
Share concerns
Teacher as literary docent
Make small suggestions
Don’t take over writing
Take notes
Focus on Writing Products
Conventions of Writing
Writing Craft
Elements of literature
Impact / Appeal
Creativity
6+ Traits of Writing
Audience & Purpose
Portfolios
Exhibition
Work in Progress
Self-Evaluative
Evaluation - Standardized
Portfolios are collections of one's work designed to provide opportunities to reflect on progress or change over a period of time.
Launching Portfolios
Start by collecting one's own work
Invite guests to share authentic portfolios
Create a place to collect work
Set aside specific times for portfolio work (ritualize)
Extended Audience Response
Rubrics & Checklists
Constructed in Classrooms or Externally Mandated
Designed to Help Guide Observation
Turn Qualitative Information into Numerical Data
Statements Concerning What We Value about Writing
Rubrics Defined
Set of guidelines for distinguishing between levels of
performance
Descriptors for defining each level
Benchmark examples are often provided
Can be Used for Self-Evaluation of Products
Negotiating Criteria for Quality Writing
Standards documents
Writing Awards Criteria
Teachers' Knowledge
Examples from Literature
6 Traits
Community Ideas & Norms
4th Grade Criteria for Quality Writing
Poetic language / word choice
Unique ideas / not generic
Makes sense
Interesting - want to finish reading it
Has emotional impact
Has details / answers readers' questions
Proper sentence structure
Proper format / Legible
Correct writing conventions
Writing for a Prompt 1
Work Backwards – From Rubric to Topic
Practice before test taking
Focus on Conventions
Not from the Heart
What do the Test Graders Want to See?
Writing for a Prompt 2
Address the Prompt
KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid
Write in First Person Wherever Possible
Include Beginning, Middle & End
Be Sure Writing is Legible
Proofread at least Twice!
Assessing Readers & Reading: Focus on Navigating
& Comprehension
Providing Evidence of Understanding
During Reading:
Immediate reactions - laugh, cry etc.
Code Text during reading
Think Aloud during reading
After Reading:
Talk about the text - paraphrase
Write a response entry
Answer questions
Write a book review / Summarize
Draw a picture
The 7 Big Reading Assessments
Teacher Observation
Reader Response Logs
Oral Reading Analyses
Think Aloud Protocols
Retellings
Reading Conferences
Reflection Logs
Reader Response Logs
Designed to get readers to share their ideas and reactions
Can become glorified book reports
Need continued response from peers and teacher
Not a writing assessment
Reader Response Log Example 1
Title-Author-Date-Genre
Retell What Happened
25%
React to What Happened 75%
Reader Response Log Example 2
Title / Author / Date / Genre
Noticings
Literary Connections / Personal Connections
Wonderings
Additional Thoughts
Oral Reading Analyses
To develop a Miscue Ear: Goes beyond correct and incorrect
Focus on what the reader is attending to, and what
strategies the reader employs
Always involves a retelling
Running Records
Taken One on One
Can be used with any text
Consistent notations
Focus on what a reader can do
Analyzed over Cueing Systems: Meaning, Syntax, Pragmatics
and Grapho-Phonic
Think Aloud Protocols
A window for gathering immediate reactions to texts
Provides information about how readers navigate text
Provides information about what readers are attending to,
and not attending to, during reading
Provides access to reading and thinking processes
Occurs during the reading process
Can be used with any text
Must be modeled to be effective
Prompts for Reporting
Mark text to signal when to report
Have specific questions for reporting
Stop at end of each page to report
Report whenever reader chooses
Read aloud and report at specific intervals
Tape Recording Think Alouds
Provide quiet space for tape recording
Let students practice with tape recorder
Don’t collect more than you are willing to analyze
Explain to parents, administrators why you are tape
recording children
Get a quality microphone & recorder
Analyzing Think Alouds
Read / Listen to the think aloud for an holistic sense of
the reported data
If transcribing, mark general codes within text
Consider what the reader attended to and what the reader was
trying to do
Evaluate the think aloud on specific criteria
Decide instructional strategies
Retellings
Retelling is an act of recounting, for a specific audience,
the meanings and events that have been constructed during reading.
Four Types: Oral to Oral / Oral to Written / Written to Oral
/ Written to Written
Analyzing Retellings
Reference to Basic Elements of literature (setting,
characters)
Sequence of the story (plot)
Challenges / Resolution
Advanced Elements - Mood, Point of View, Symbols, Extended
Metaphor, Themes
Reading Conferences
Interviews with readers
Can be short discussions
Setting expectation for meta-cognitive awareness
Keep track of information
Formal Interview forms
Once a Week (Status of Class)
Reading Interview Questions
Who is a good reader you know? Why are they good at reading?
What do you do when you don’t understand what you are
reading?
How would you help someone having trouble reading?
What do you like best / least about reading in school?
Reflection Logs
A Letter to Parents
Done Daily
Allows Students to Articulate Their Learning
Provides Opportunities for Parental Interactions
Record of Learning Over Time
Evaluating Comprehension
Text Within Text: Engagement
Text Upon Text: Interpretation
Text Against Text: Criticism
Engagement
Can describe visual images
Follows along with characters
Relives the experience of the story
Anticipates events in story
Recalls specific events, language and story details
Offers immediate reactions (laughs, worries, etc)
Able to enter the secondary world of the story
Interpretation
Connects story to own experiences
Connects story to other stories and texts read
Connects stories to world events
Understands characters challenges in story world as
connected to real world challenges
Puts self in place of characters
Criticism
Generalizes from literary experiences to world experiences
Develops themes / larger issues
Evaluates characters motives
Infers author’s intentions / histories / perspectives
Evaluates “quality” of the story
Understands relationship between parts of a story and the
whole
Analyzes own responses to stories
Re-examines own worldview
Standardized Tests as a Genre
The abilities needed to do well on a Standardized Test may
differ from those needed to do well in the Reading Workshop.
As teachers, we demonstrate that we value ST even if we
don’t.
The ability to demonstrate reading abilities in a test
situation is a learned behavior
Most Standardized Tests only require recall abilities
Before We Begin!
Demystify the Tests - Explain how, why they are used
Ask students to share past concerns and experiences
Ask students what strategies they have used in the past
Explain testing situation and requirements
Practice Bubble Sheet Procedures
Acquire Test Prep Materials
Teaching Standardized Tests as a Genre
Immerse students in reading the test-passage genre
Discuss the elements and structures of test passages
Investigate the Language of Questions
Help children develop a scavenger-hunt mentality
Type list of things to look for in a passage by reading
questions first
What would test-makers say is the Main Idea? - NOT - What is the Main Idea?
Work on a small number of questions at a time, before going
on to others
Teach children to mark passages as they read
Begin to Identify the TRICKS test-makers use to fool
students
Analyzing Test Questions
What is being asked?
What words are confusing?
Difference Between AN answer and the BEST answer
Practice paraphrasing questions
Have students practice writing questions for some passages
using “test-language”
Types of Test Questions
Analytical - explain causes
Author Intentions - what author meant
Categorical - which best describes
Comparative - same or different
Definitional - X means…
Evaluative - best solution
Identification - which one
Sequential - what order
Predictive - what might happen
Synthesis - what might a good title be
School-Wide Considerations
What are the goals and objectives for our instruction?
How will we gather information?
What criteria will we use to make decisions about the value of student's work or progress?
How will we use this information to drive instruction?
How will we report our findings to concerned stakeholders?
Literacy Web-Site:
http://serafini.nevada.edu
E-Mail:
serafini@unlv.nevada.edu